AI severance review

Counteroffer · Answers · severance Source: https://trycounteroffer.com/answers/ai-severance-review

Short answer: AI severance review uses large language models trained on attorney-drafted contracts and curated market data to analyze your severance agreement and produce a structured review. Done well, it captures most of the value an employment attorney's analysis would, at a fraction of the cost and time. Done poorly (e.g., raw ChatGPT output), it can miss state-specific issues, mishandle citations, and produce generic recommendations. The key differences are training data, benchmark library, and human audit.

What AI severance review actually does

A well-designed AI severance review:

Reads your severance agreement
Extracts every clause and matches it to the categories in a curated rubric
Identifies negotiable items, market benchmarks, and required carve-outs
Generates a structured report with specific recommendations and counter language
Cites legal authority for state-law and federal-law claims
Goes through human review for quality control before delivery

The result is a delivered PDF analyzing your specific document, not a generic guide or a chat conversation.

Why AI works for this task

Severance review is well-suited to AI for several reasons:

The agreements follow consistent structural patterns
The categories of negotiable items are well-defined (multipliers, equity, healthcare, releases)
Market benchmarks can be encoded and updated
Legal citations are deterministic (specific statutes, specific cases)
The output format is standardized

The repetitive, pattern-matching nature of contract review is exactly what current AI does well. The judgment-heavy parts (when to escalate, how to weigh trade-offs) benefit from human audit, which is why responsible services include human review.

What AI severance review is NOT

Not legal advice. AI services analyze contracts; they don't represent you in a dispute.
Not appropriate for active litigation. If you're in dispute, you need an attorney.
Not a replacement for licensed counsel on complex matters. Multi-state, M&A-related, or discrimination-adjacent situations need a lawyer.
Not raw ChatGPT output. Generic AI without curated training, benchmarks, and audit will miss state-specific issues.

The Counteroffer approach

Our severance review process:

You submit the agreement plus context (role, tenure, state, priorities)
The model runs the document against our severance rubric with all the negotiable categories, state-specific overlays, and federal law requirements
We benchmark against curated comp and severance data
A human reviewer audits the output and corrects any errors before delivery
The PDF report is delivered to your inbox

Cost: $199 flat. Turnaround: 24 hours.

The result is a delivered analysis that captures most of what an employment attorney's analysis would deliver, at a fraction of the cost.

When to use AI review vs. attorney

Use AI review when:

Your situation is within the typical severance framework
Total package value is $50K-$1M
No active legal disputes or potential litigation
You're executing negotiation yourself

Use an attorney when:

Suspected discrimination, retaliation, or whistleblower issues
Active or imminent litigation
Large equity packages or M&A-related separations
Multi-jurisdiction or international complexity
Section 16 officer issues

Many people use both: start with AI review for speed and structure, then bring in an attorney for specific complex items if needed.

What to do next

If you want a delivered AI-powered severance review with human audit, with peer benchmarks and counter language ready to send HR, see Severance Review. $199, 24 hours, full refund if we miss something material.

Get your contract reviewed

If you want a delivered review of your specific document with cited authority and counter language, see https://trycounteroffer.com/severance.

Last updated: Sun May 31 2026 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Counteroffer is a contract analysis service, not a law firm. This page is informational, not legal advice.