Counteroffer. Get reviewed

What's a reasonable non-compete duration?

Counteroffer · Answers · non-compete Source: https://trycounteroffer.com/answers/reasonable-non-compete-duration

Short answer: 6 months is generally reasonable in most jurisdictions. 12 months is typical and usually enforceable. 18 months is heavily scrutinized. 24 months or more is rarely upheld for ordinary employees outside sale-of-business contexts. Massachusetts caps at 12 months by statute; Washington at 18 months. Senior executive non-competes can sometimes reach 18-24 months but require strong consideration.

Duration bands and enforcement risk

Duration Enforcement likelihood Notes
3-6 months High Almost always reasonable
6-12 months High Standard industry practice
12-18 months Moderate Subject to scope and interest scrutiny
18-24 months Low Often blue-penciled to 12-18
24-36 months Very low Rarely enforced outside sale of business
Beyond 36 months Essentially none Almost never enforced for ordinary employment

These bands reflect general practice. Specific outcomes depend on state law, scope, legitimate interest, and the employee's role.

Why duration matters

The longer the restriction, the more it interferes with the employee's ability to earn a living. Courts apply heightened scrutiny to longer durations because:

Most states explicitly or implicitly use a sliding scale: shorter restrictions need less justification; longer restrictions require stronger legitimate interests.

Statutory duration caps

Several states have explicit statutory caps:

Outside these statutory caps, common-law reasonableness applies in most states, with 12 months as the practical norm.

What employers can do to justify longer

When employers want longer restrictions, they typically need to show:

Even with these justifications, durations longer than 24 months are rarely upheld for ordinary employment.

Industry-specific norms

Different industries have different norms:

Negotiating duration

When negotiating a non-compete:

Always start by requesting removal. The first ask should be no non-compete at all.

Second ask: minimum duration. If the employer insists on a non-compete, propose 3-6 months. Cite peer practice and the employer's actual protectable interest.

Third ask: tied to consideration. If the employer wants longer, the duration should track the consideration. "I'll accept 12 months if you provide garden leave at 75% of base."

Fourth ask: tied to specific conditions. "12 months if I leave for a direct competitor in [specific list]; 6 months otherwise."

Carve-outs: Even within the duration, carve out specific situations (returning to a prior employer, working with prior clients, transitioning to a non-competing role).

Worked example

Senior software engineer at a Series C company. Initial offer includes 24-month non-compete with no geographic limit and "any company that competes with Company" activity scope.

Analysis:

Counter:

Most employers will agree to substantial reduction when the original draft is overbroad. The math typically favors negotiation over hard insistence on the broad version.

What to do next

If you want a delivered analysis of your specific non-compete's duration in light of your state's law, role, and the employer's actual protectable interest, we deliver one in 24 hours for $199. See Non-Compete Review.


Related answers

Get your contract reviewed

If you want a delivered review of your specific document with cited authority and counter language, see https://trycounteroffer.com/non-compete.

Last updated: Sun May 31 2026 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Counteroffer is a contract analysis service, not a law firm. This page is informational, not legal advice.